Why does the overlapped area on some progressively dipped steel have a rougher surface and thicker zinc coating than the other area of the same piece of steel?

First let’s make the assumption the steel is fairly thick, as large and long structural sections requiring progressive dipping tend to be. In all likelihood, the surface of the steel dipped in first has a very typical zinc coating appearance of shiny gray to silver and has a coating thickness of eight to ten mils, very standard for high silicon, reactive steel. When the steel is flipped end-to-end and the uncoated steel is immersed in the molten zinc, it will galvanize in normal fashion, very similar to the end dipped in first. However, the overlapped surface (dipped in twice) may exhibit roughness and have a measured coating thickness of 20 mils or more. 

During the second dip the overlapped surface area of the steel is once again exposed to the heat of the molten zinc and some of the free zinc Eta layer melts off. However, when the crystalline structure of the intermetallic alloy layers of the overlapped area, in particular the Zeta layer, has more heat applied during the second dip, it grows again and this time at a different rate and in a very random pattern compared to the adjacent steel surfaces being exposed to the zinc for the first time. Essentially, the overlapped area intermetallic layers have the opportunity (heat applied) to grow twice. So, the coating of the overlapped area is not only thicker than the adjacent area only dipped once but is rougher because of the chaotic grow of the zinc crystal structure in the Zeta intermetallic layer.

Are you still looking for the right answer? Ask an Expert


terry wolfe

I have always thought that a Progressive dip (aka double dip) of a tubular frame, weldment, or even straight pipe was not a good idea.  The main reason would be because at the most obvious area that would need attention would be at the double dip “line”.

Inside of a tubular piece would be impossible to inspect or repair in the event the line, if over lapped could burn the first dip away, or because of being concealed would be difficult to know if the zinc left a unprotected area on the inside after the dip was finished.

Do we have a technical paper supporting or dismissing my concern?  How about a professional opinion?


Add Your Comment